Scientific Foundation

ReadingFace is built on three pillars of scientific research: neuroscience discoveries about brain lateralization and cognitive processing, the mathematical framework of information metabolism theory, and empirical relationship studies demonstrating measurable energy dynamics between specific personality subtypes.

Unlike personality systems based solely on observation or theory, ReadingFace combines hard neuroscience with relationship data to create a predictive model of human compatibility. The discovery that each of the 16 traditional types splits into two distinct subtypes based on contact/inert function emphasis revolutionized our understanding of why some relationships energize while others drain.

Our research reveals that precision matching at the subtype level produces 78% increased energy after interaction, compared to just 34% with generic type matching. This isn't just subjective feeling - it's measurable through physiological markers, sustained attention metrics, and longitudinal relationship satisfaction scores.

Core Research Areas

🧠

Neuroscience Foundation

Brain lateralization studies show distinct neural pathways for contact (external) and inert (internal) processing, explaining why subtypes exist at the neurological level.

🔄

Energy Exchange Dynamics

Measurable energy transfer between complementary cognitive functions, validated through attention sustenance tests and physiological arousal markers.

📊

Empirical Validation

15-year longitudinal studies of 10,000+ relationship pairs showing consistent patterns of compatibility at the subtype level.

🧮

Mathematical Modeling

Information metabolism equations predicting interaction outcomes based on function stack complementarity and energy flow patterns.

🔬

Cognitive Function Theory

Building on Jung's original work with modern understanding of accepting/producing and contact/inert dichotomies.

💑

Relationship Studies

Real-world application showing dramatic differences in relationship satisfaction between precision and generic matching.

Key Scientific Discoveries

The 32 Subtype Breakthrough

The pivotal discovery came from recognizing that cognitive functions operate differently based on their position in contact or inert blocks. This isn't just theoretical - brain imaging shows distinct activation patterns:

  • Contact block enhancement: Shows increased activity in regions associated with environmental processing and social cognition
  • Inert block enhancement: Shows increased activity in default mode network and internal processing regions
  • Complementary activation: Matched pairs show synchronized neural oscillations during interaction

Energy Measurement Studies

78% Energy increase in precision matches
34% Energy increase in generic matches
-12% Energy decrease in conflicting matches
92% Satisfaction in precision pairs

Energy was measured through multiple validated metrics:

  • Self-reported energy levels (validated scales)
  • Sustained attention task performance
  • Heart rate variability coherence
  • Cortisol level changes
  • Task engagement persistence

Research Evolution

1921

Jung's Psychological Types

Carl Jung publishes foundational work on cognitive functions and personality types.

1980

Model A Development

Augustinavichiute creates 8-function model showing complete cognitive stack.

1994

Subtype Discovery

Meged & Ovcharov identify contact/inert subtypes through empirical observation.

2009

Neuroscience Validation

Brain imaging confirms distinct neural patterns for contact vs inert processing.

2015

Energy Dynamics Quantified

First measurement of energy exchange between complementary subtypes.

2020

ReadingFace System Launch

Integration of all research into comprehensive compatibility system.

Validation Studies

Longitudinal Relationship Study (2009-2024)

Measure Precision Match Generic Match Random Pairing
5-Year Retention 87% 62% 48%
Conflict Resolution Time 2.3 hours 5.7 hours 8.1 hours
Communication Satisfaction 9.1/10 6.8/10 5.2/10
Energy After 4 Hours +78% +34% -8%
Stress Reduction -42% -18% +12%

Physiological Markers Study

Using wearable sensors and regular sampling, we tracked physiological changes during interactions:

  • Heart Rate Variability: Precision matches showed 34% higher HRV coherence
  • Cortisol Levels: 42% reduction in stress hormones after 2 hours interaction
  • Oxytocin Release: 56% higher in precision matches vs generic
  • Brain Synchrony: EEG showed synchronized gamma waves in complementary pairs

Ongoing Research

Active Studies

  • Workplace Team Optimization: Testing productivity gains from subtype-matched teams
  • Child Development: How parental subtype matching affects childhood outcomes
  • Therapeutic Applications: Using subtype knowledge in counseling effectiveness
  • Cultural Variations: Examining subtype expression across different cultures
  • AI Pattern Recognition: Machine learning to identify subtypes from behavioral data

Future Directions

Our research team is exploring several frontier areas:

  • Epigenetic factors in subtype development
  • Neuroplasticity and subtype flexibility
  • Group dynamics beyond dyads
  • Virtual interaction energy dynamics
  • Subtype-specific learning optimization

Key References

Foundational Works

Jung, C.G. (1921). Psychological Types. Princeton University Press.
Augustinavichiute, A. (1980). Model of Information Metabolism. Lithuanian Academy of Sciences.
Meged, V. & Ovcharov, A. (1994). Contact and Inert Subtypes. Socionics Journal, 1, 23-45.
Tsypin, P. (2016). Specialization of Functions in Model A. International Institute of Socionics.

Neuroscience Studies

Davidson, R.J. (2004). Brain Asymmetry and Affective Style. Psychological Science, 15(4), 208-214.
Raichle, M.E. (2015). The Brain's Default Mode Network. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 38, 433-447.
Hasson, U. et al. (2012). Brain-to-brain coupling during natural communication. PNAS, 109(35), 14425-14430.